152 points

As we know from Gore and Clinton, national numbers mean jack shit. Vote!

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Vote and volunteer to give rides to those that wouldn’t be able to vote without it. (if you can)

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Exactly. Don’t get complacent! Every vote is needed and matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clinton especially. That +8 margin of victory made Dems complacent.

If we turn out for Harris the same way we did for Biden on 2020, for the exact same reasons, we’ll win handedly. It wouldn’t even be close.

Turn out and vote. Make it a hate vote if you must. Remember the four terrible years under Trump the Traitor and consider him within striking distance of the oval office once again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d say ALL polling numbers mean jack shit, except for the set we get in November that’s run by the States. Thus we must make sure our voices are heard in THAT poll, which means…VOTE!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-40 points

Only matters if you live in one of the like 7 swing states that matter, otherwise just vote for whomever you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

If Trump gets the Presidency, you still can affect national level politics by voting in your Representative and Senator.

If Democrats hold Senate and House, they can protect us more from Trump. Every state matters, because every state has 2 Senators at a minimum (and Senators are very, very powerful). Senators are state-wide and therefore immune to any gerrymandering (only House Members have the Gerrymandering problem)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There’s also a slew of other local elections that can be equally, if not more important than national congressional races. A great deal of the GOP’s ability to put a stranglehold on progress has been from their fairly dedicated takeover of statehouses and local elections. We need to have an even greater level of determination when it comes to showing up to vote. Every. Single. Election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

There are 100 senators.
66 are not on the ballot in 2024.
Of the 34 remaining, 23 are safe and 2 are likely.
That leaves 9 seats. 7 are leaning one way or the other.
2 are toss ups, Ohio and Montana. Vote if live there. Probably even the leaning 7. But the rest…?

As an aside, if all the leans break the way they are leaning, Dems have to hold the two toss ups to have a 50-50 Senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

If you get enough people from the biggest party—the doesn’t vote party—to vote with you, then you also live in a swing state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
135 points

Don’t believe the naysayers. No matter which state you are in, your vote is important. Extreme Conservatives have been taking over school boards and imposing their agenda on kids.

Offices like Sheriff, Coroner, Secretary of State, Lt Governor, State Representatives, City and County Councils etc. are all important.

Every Vote Counts!!!

permalink
report
reply
27 points

And every cunt votes, so do it too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Thank you for making me laugh today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Definitely agree with this. As someone from Oregon where my vote doesn’t really matter on the national elections I make sure to vote still to influence local elections. Only problem with those is that finding info on the candidates can be hard or sometimes there is only one candidate for a position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m lazy so I tend to look up endorsements from unions

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s a good idea. I usually look to see who the Oregon Progressive Party endorses but unions would probably be good to look at too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oregonians also get a voters guide with statements from candidates and for/against statements for ballot measures. It is useful in combination with other sources of information. And we do entirely vote by mail, so we have time to do a little research.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Coroner??? As in the person who notes that people are dead??? That’s an elected position? What? Why? How can that even possibly be political? “This person has gone red but they should have gone blue instead. Make them get back up and start walking around until they do dying right!”; “Cause of death: Being a gorram <insult of choice>!”; “You’re not allowed to die, we’ve had too many deaths this week and I won’t get elected again if you do. Stop pretending to be cold and stiff!”. What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The coroner could rule on whether a death is suspicious or not. Like if a brown person dies in custody, the coroner may or may not chock it up to “natural causes” depending on their political leanings.

This is just wild conjecture on my part – I don’t think I get to vote for coroner locally – but I could definitely see that happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

As usual, national polls mean nothing since we don’t have national elections.

But let’s see where it stands in the states that count, all of these numbers are from before the DNC and Kennedy dropping out, so we’ll need a re-run in a week or two. I’m also adding some states people have been talking about.

Arizona: Toss up. Tie, Trump +1 +2
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

Nevada: Harris +6, +8, +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

New Mexico: Harris +8, +9
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

Texas: Trump +5, +6
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/texas/

Georgia: Trump +1, +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

Florida: Trump +5, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/florida/

North Carolina: Toss up. Tie, Harris +1
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

Virginia: Harris +3
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

Pennsylvania: Toss up. Harris +1, +2, Trump +1
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

Michigan: Harris +6, +7, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

Wisconsin: Harris +6, +7, +8
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

Minnesota: Harris +5, +7, +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

Huge shifts in Nevada, New Mexico, Michigan and Wisconsin which, under Biden, were a loss to Trump and shortly before the official shift were still barely Trump.

Trump is up in Texas, but only +5 or +6 which is consistent with the +6 win in 2020 and +9 in 2016.

Florida and Georgia are not the toss up states people are making them out to be.

The Muslim Pro-Gaza vote has had 0 impact in Michigan. Still Harris’ race to lose there.

Overall, this is the best showing for the Democrats so far this year, let’s plot it on the map:

Of the three toss up states, a win in either PA or NC puts Harris over the top. Arizona does not. She’s 2 short if she gets AZ but not PA or NC.

Trump needs BOTH PA and NC to hit exactly 270. PA + AZ he’s at 265. NC + AZ he’s at 262.

This is really the first time in months that the electoral math has been going away from Trump.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Good write up. National polls don’t mean shit and this is far from a done deal as you’ve shown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’ll be sitting up all night on November 5th with spreadsheets. :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

🤮 I’m going to the mountains far from any signal save short wave radio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you have a YT or Twitch stream, please share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re the hero we need!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thanks a lot for the detailed breakdown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Excellent summarization. 🍻

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

If this holds true, which is unlikely without strong voter turnout, then Harris just needs PA or NC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

As a New Mexican, those polls had to have been erroneous. There’s no way in hell the state would have turned red, not for Trump. The last time our state was red in the general election was 2004, and before that, 1988. You all don’t have to worry about us, but I will gladly attend a Harris/Walz rally here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Polls. Don’t. Matter. Fucking. Vote.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Polls are a useful tool for gauging popular opinion at a given moment, and can help politicians make rational judgements during a campaign.

Biden wouldn’t have dropped out if people ignored polling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Everyone here is right about this still being neck and neck.

That said, let’s also take 2 seconds to acknowledge that Harris has kind of been killing it over the last 3-4 weeks. She took over that campaign apparatus and moved with urgency, precision, and polish. Moreover, she’s not taking her opponent’s bate.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Harris has been absolutely stellar, I thought she was OK before, but she has clearly exceeded my expectations.

PS: I think that last word should probably be “bait” not “bate”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Makes me wonder if Biden maybe knew he might drop out earlier than he actually did and he was silently prepping her to be ready to go full force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He, his family, his cabinet, and the entire Dem leadership knew the day after his debate. Everything else was obfuscation so they didn’t send public perception of the party into a tail spin while they circled the wagons. All the talk of “everyone still supports Biden 100%” was BS and anyone paying attention knew it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s what I was thinking as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Trump’s 'bate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m pretty confident he’s not physically capable of that anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

She’s deflated considerably since the Convention.

Refusing to allow Palestinian-American to speak and “The most lethal military” has and will continue to cost her with the antiwar and posesses basic human decency demographic.

She might still win. But historically moving to the right has only lost layup elections for democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Trying to appeal to people that spend most of the day on the internet trying to find a reason not to vote isn’t a winning strategy.

If you’re fine with Trump winning, you don’t actually care about Palestinians, you only care about putting on a performance about caring about Palestinians for an internet audience. There’s no way for a political campaign to have success by appealing to people that have this level of internet brained irrationality.

The “not committed” people decided to remove themselves from the equation, which has resulted in their concerns not being a factor in this election. If the point is to only express anger on the internet (and not accomplish any change) then congratulations, you have someone else to be angry on the internet over. Like most anger on the internet it will be heavily monetized and make some people a lot of money. But they aren’t ever going to have success trying to appease people that profit off of expressing anger. Whatever they do won’t be good enough because there’s a profit motive to this anger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I don’t understand your logic here. Declaring yourself “uncommitted” is the only leverage you have over a party that wants your vote. Telling them “I’m gonna vote for you but I won’t like it!” sounds the exact same to them as “I’m gonna vote for you and I love you!”. Once they have your vote guaranteed, they no longer have to address your concerns. This movement is targeting democrats because they are perceived as more susceptible to this kind of pressure (anti genocide). However, the pressure has to be applied to have a chance of success.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

As unlikely as it is cuz chump is historically shit. But possible that Harris loses. Should that happen. I hope you remember this post.

Because it woulda been real easy to turn this coinflip into a landslide. Let a genocide victim speak at the DNC and use the Lehey Law to embargo the Occupation. Cut off the bombs.

That’s it. Democrats would have locked in both houses and the presidency for a generation or more. Instead of taking a victory lap right now you’re here fingerwagging like the good little liberal you are.

Does AIPAC give you headpats or something? I know they’re not paying you. I’m not a liberal. So I’m not dumb enough to believe that. But what do you get out of being a volunteer amateur propagandist for a genocidal bloodthirsty empire?

Don’t answer that. I don’t actually care. My start and finish line is genocide. If you support it in any way, I dont support you under any circumstances. Nothing else matters. Because that’s the cliff of morality. If you’re OK with it anywhere happening to anyone youd be ok with it here, happening to your neighbors. And that makes you less than human and not worth my time. (You owe me $5 for this reality check btw)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean I think among the majority of people she came out of the convention strong. But yeah as a progressive her speech definitely deflated me, still gonna vote but disappointed overall.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments