107 points

Sad, from a nostalgia point of view, but probably a win, environmentally. We have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles, the mylar pouches are pretty much all single use.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Source on this “pipeline”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

…do you not believe bottles are recycled? Or is this just a snarky way of pointing out how ineffective the system is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If you think recycling is effective you have fallen to their propaganda

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was a bit too snarky

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Recycling bin > recycling lorry > container > third world country > sea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

But much better to use aluminium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

At least aluminum actually is recyclable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There is still a plastic liner on the inside, glass, stainless steel or nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Plastic and glass aren’t recyclable huh? Better just throw them in the landfill, much better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points

We actually don’t have a pipeline to recycle plastic bottles though, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When you say “we” as in you and me, yeah, I don’t think we could manage to recycle them. “We” as a planet certainly can and many countries do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Which countries? I thought only 9% of plastic is actually recycled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

Bottle deposit systems are generally effective. In Sweden, 90-95% of the pet plastic in drink bottles makes it back to a factory to be used as raw material for new bottles. We don’t really recycle the hdpe lids or polyester labels, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Why aren’t we just using glass, as we did for decades just fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That’s not actually a solution when talking single-use either. Remaking the bottles from recycled glass is incredibly energy intensive and not an environmentally friendly process either. Multi-use bottles are much better, but the cleaning required also isn’t that simple and also relatively energy intensive (far from remaking the bottles of course).

There’s also practical downsides to glass (heavy, breakable), but those are subjective and their relevance highly depends on the use case.

Ideally, we wouldn’t buy stuff to drink in any kind of bottle, but just use tap water. possibly just buy some concentrated stuff to then make your actual drink at home. Nothing beats the effectiveness of transporting water through a simple pipe, but that isn’t even possible everywhere in the world due to drinking water quality issues…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well that would be because the god-king CEO would have like 45k less per year out of his 38,000,000 dollar salary without bonuses and stock value if we were to do that, you fuckin peasant idiot chump. Not only that but their enabling middle management might have as much as $200 less in their annual bonuses. Think for someone else other than yourself for once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Our school won’t let us send reusable glass containers excuse of fear of breakage.

I kinda understand, but our first grader has been using them for snacks at home for 5 years and never broken one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Good, the packages can’t even be recycled. Corporations should be held liable for their plastic waste contributions via the packaging.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

You think the bottles are going to be any better? They’re going to end up in the ocean with all of the other plastic bottles from other drinks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

PET bottles are very easily recicled. In my country a sizeable amount of PET bottles sold are 100%recycled PET

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But only a small fraction of the plastic gets recycled.

If 9/10ths of the plastic ends up in a landfill or the Pacific garbage patch, having 1/10th of that plastic recycled into another bottle (which then will eventually have 9/10ths tossed in a landfill anyways) isn’t doing much. It’s better than not recycling at all, but it’s green washing to say that it’s “eco friendly”, which Capri-Sun allegedly did at this trade show.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, glass or stainless steel

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not aluminum? Have you ever seen single serving drinks sold in stainless steel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those bottles in the image look like plastic. I can’t find anything indicating they are using glass or stainless steel.

permalink
report
parent
reply

you only need to make them pay the price of each packaging every day until it biodegrades. you’ll see change very quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’ll spend 300millions in lawyer fees to find a loophole where they only need to pay one packet for the time it takes to burn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Any plastic should be considered unrecyclable. At least pouches use less overall plastic then bottles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Most plastics are difficult (if at all possible) to recycle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree. Fixed my grammar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

If your childhood is defined by Capri Sun, you have bigger problems than the container in which it’s distributed.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

My childhood was defined by Pokemon Red, sat morning cartoons, and drinking 0.25 cent plastic fruit hugs.

What problems do I face?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oncoming middle age?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You talkim the ol white plastic bottles with the foil cap and no labels?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep those are hugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I bought a case of hugs for a bbq I had over the summer for my friends who are now all into their 30s. Figured it would be a fun little hit of nostalgia.

They were more popular than I expected, and actually better than I remember them being.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m happy that your childhood was defined by a stable career and a nice car, I guess…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If wishing made it so …

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh hey, it’s a new thread to spread disinformation about plastic recycling!

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I just double checked and the article doesn’t mention the words recycle or eco at all, does it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a nothing burger!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I have always, for the entirety of their existence, hated those dumb pouches. Good riddance as far as I’m concerned.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Seconded. And trying to stab the flexing surface with that weak-ass straw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You have to kind of service the top edge of the hole with the tip of the straw to soften it up before you guide it the rest of the way in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Skill issue 😉

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unironically, there’s a technique to it. I forgot how after I got older, and was genuinely frustrated trying to drink from one until I remembered how to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The pouches seem like less plastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They have these revolutionary containers made from paper that is layered in order to make it hard and card like. Almost stiff as a board. And is capable of holding liquids and also breaks down very easily. 😒

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What are they lined with to prevent them from getting soggy from contact with the liquid?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m in!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They made a really loud noise in the lunchroom if you inflated the pouch all the way, folded over the straw to seal it, then stomped on it really hard with your shoe. This was before mentally deranged people started shooting up schools though, so maybe don’t try it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Mentally deranged people have been shooting up schools since before Capri Sun was even invented…

How old are you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not going to look it up to verify, but I’m pretty sure Capri Sun existed before Columbine.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 512K

    Comments