Unless there’s a lot of dudes with 3 it really is less than 1 on average.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/
I’m partially responsible for this stat
By being female or through loss?
Cuz I mean roughly half the population of the US has zero by default and they are included in this statistic. So for them you may also be part of why the number is greater than zero.
The number of skeletons inside of a human body is statistically greater than 1.
actually, you’re forgetting about amputees and people born with fewer limbs. it’s likely less than 1.
the question is: is a skeleton that’s missing pieces still “one skeleton”? And if so, at which point does it become not a skeleton? Because i’m reasonably sure you wouldn’t call a severed foot a skeleton even though it is still arguably “one skeleton” that is just missing a lot of pieces.
And you’re forgetting that about 1% of the population is pregnant at any given time and has another whole human inside of them.
honestly curious about how those two would end up statistically balancing out.
So in other words I’m above average
The average person has fewer than two legs.
Some women have four legs. It’s a temporary condition, but I gander that it’s common enough to offset the amputees.
What happens if I put my foot up your ass? Whose foot is it in this equation?
Depends, do you have control of it once it’s in? If not, then it’s probably still the other person’s, they’re just using you as a shoe.
