So I’ve realized that in conversations I’ll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I’ve been thinking that it’s not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

“What’s up guys?” “How’s it going man?” "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y’all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

351 points

Cunts

permalink
report
reply
93 points

We can close this thread now. The question has been answered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

instance name checks out

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Threadkiller

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Found the Australian

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

In New Zealand of all places!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Kiwis call each other cunts almost as much as aussies. We insult each other just as much, but we have better taste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They wish they could be our western island.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Oi! You’re a good cunt!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d accept bloody beautiful bastards as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, finally! A worthy alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
  • Fucks

  • Shits

  • Turds

  • Maggots

permalink
report
parent
reply
171 points

y’all

permalink
report
reply
70 points

Y’all doesn’t get enough love. It is gender neutral and extremely versatile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Vosotros agrees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Ustedes if you’re less formal or you live outside Spain 😁

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Or in German: euch

permalink
report
parent
reply

I agree. It’s the plural of “you” that should be the official standard, since it disambiguates “you.” It can even be broadened to include larger groups via “all y’all,” as in, not just y’all in talking to, but all y’all in the house.

It can replace “guys”, but not “man,” though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The plural of you is yous or ye. In Ireland at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It sounds cringeworthy if you’re not American though. The standard way of saying it is “you lot” and other dialects, like mine, have “yous”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here where I’m from in the US, you occasionally hear a “y’alls” and now I’m going to start using it as a cultural gap between your dialect and mine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s become the go-to in my company

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do you work with me? I’m in the US south and my EU colleagues love “y’all” and have started using it (ironically or not :) pretty often.

Warms my heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can’t do it, I don’t want to sound like I’m from the South.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If everyone starts using it, it won’t sound southern any more. C’mon, you know you want to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Take it from them!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And, for larger groups, all y’all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

you’uns

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Youse if you’re a Geordie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

further down under you may hear “hey, yous lot…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or if you’re near Pittsburgh, “yinz” is the proper spelling/pronunciation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I use y’all a lot and im near Chicago

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I’ve started using it and I’m Canadian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’ve started using it and I’m north of Canada … In Detroit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Me too, but I’m from 'round Minnesota so it’s more like ja’ll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

For those not in the US south and afraid of being judged, “all” on its own is an option.

“Hi all” is unlikely to raise any eyebrows

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Hi everybody!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

yinz

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Bingo. I use y’all for everything. Even the singular. It’s casual, neutral and relaxed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Scott the Woz on Lemmy? :o

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Hey y’all, Scott here.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

yall sounds super trashy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

A lot of people use “folks” for plural.

I feel like “guys” is fairly un-gendered but people disagree with me. Personally, I haven’t used the word “guys” to refer to anything male in what seems like forever.

“Bud” and “fella” are good singulars.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I used to have a maths teacher who called almost every number “guy”.

“And this guy goes to zero, while this guy goes to infinity!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I really, really wish we could degender “guy” and “guys”. I know plenty of people of all genders that use the words in general to describe people, objects, concepts, everything. The only holdouts are people that insist on it specifically meaning males. Ironically, these people are often the hardcore feminists.

If other English words can change their meanings and be claimed/reclaimed by certain groups, why can’t others?

Take guy! Use it to describe whatever you want! Free it of its historically phallic shackles!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Yeah, I agree with you gal, while we’re at it I wish we could degender “gal”, “chick”, and “doll” too. Equality for all!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

This sounds not to dissimilar to those who argued that legalizing gay marriage would lead to people marrying horses or their cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Guy was originally gender neutral as it was used to call someone stupidly bold (iirc). The term was most often used toward a single gender that was known for being stupidly bold and became synonymous with that gender. That’s how it became gendered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m a cis woman in IT, I’m guy, dude, man, bro… I don’t really care. You can change to make a specific person feel more confortable but most woman don’t care to be dude or guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bud is very rarely used for women (or at least for me), but it is one of my favourite things to hear tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

“Guys” is ungendered.

Reconsider whether it’s worth being friends with people that insist on fighting over the term “guys”.

And if you are surrounded by a lot of particularly sensitive people, just call them “friend” or “friends”. It works for people you both like and dislike. Glorious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sure, but as a professional (teacher) I’m not willing to put my career on the line by challenging a sensitive parent. A few years ago we were told not to use that word, and when it comes to things like that, I do as I’m told.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“Listen up you little shits”. Perfectly non-gendered!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That makes sense.

Teachers have to do a lot of stupid shit these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Aw yeahhhh, everyone’s into guys 🫦

(well, except aro/ace people maybe)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Modifying my language choices is literally the least I can do to make people feel more included, so anyone who can’t fathom doing that is for sure, not worthy of being a friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

If you are in the Midwest, Guys is absolutely gender neutral.

Edit: downvote me all you want guys, it won’t change the truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Meh, people who want to fight over the term ‘guys’ are in the minority.

They can probably just be ignored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It is indeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

A wise man once said, “I’m a dude, he’s a dudes, she’s a dude. We’re all dudes. Hey!”

permalink
report
reply
53 points
*

Strange though, that when you ask most men how many dudes they’ve slept with suddenly, she’s not a dude…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

There’s a very big difference between “dude”, referring to someone you’re talking to, and “a dude”, referring to someone you were talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Not to me there isn’t…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ive generally always agreed with the former comment, but I’ve heard this argument a few times and it does demonstrate the disconnect well. I’ve switched it up to a simple y’all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yep. Something that can only ever mean “neutral” or “man” isn’t neutral

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s just how our language works. You can also use the word “fuck” in many ways that have wildly different meanings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s funny how “just how it works out” always leads to “neutral” words having double meanings that equal “man” but never “woman”

Maybe it’s not “just how it works” and maybe it’s just bias…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

As a former resident of San Diego I have no problem sleeping with dudes. Because everyone is dude.

People think they’re clever when they ask “would you sleep with the dude?” My response is " bold of you to assume that I haven’t." Everyone is dude. You can try to twist things as much as you like but dude normalization reigns supreme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I was talking about the default assumptions people make when they hear the word. Your circumstances don’t come in to it, unless your claim is that most people share your experiences

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Out of the mouth of babes… 🥰

I believe that sentiment was also uttered by another wise man. A man of his time. Mr. Jeffrey Lebowski.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

In Australia the gender-neutral term is ‘Cunt’.

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.4K

    Posts

  • 300K

    Comments