Easy, the MTG player actually wants to draw more therefore the +4 benefits him. Neither the gun nor the rooks stand a chance against him at this point.
Yeah but they’re playing mono-W so unless they draw into another plains, probably nothing too threatening is hitting the field.
Unless they draw into their Heliod + Ballista combo
… or a tutor that lets them find their Heliod + Ballista combo
You’re forgetting that 22 is probably instant speed, which means ballista is dead before it can combo off. So white needs something else to win because strategically black is better with the extra rooks.
No bullets in the revolver and it didn’t belong to checkov so it’s not important anyway no more csrds to draw from. So A for sure
Have you considered bribery? The drugs may improve performance, but they’re addictive, and expensive. That gun could go for a fair amount of money.
Black bribes white to throw the match, and white saves face by pointing out blacks rook count. Player b wins the game, but the international chess committee send them a very, very strongly worded email
Anarchychess?
Google en hancingdrugs
