6 points

AIPAC and it’s member, known for smuggling our tax dollar for genocide.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

I find it deeply disturbing that when I opened the comment section of a post discussing 400 (now over 700) dead people, mostly innocent children, men, and women, in less than 48 hours, the first reaction was to blame “Arabs,” “Muslims,” “Tankies,” “Leftists,” and “Pro-Palestinians,” using these minority communities as tokens.

This is a glaring display f hypocrisy, these groups are portrayed in a positive light when it benefits politically, only to be thrown under the bus when they are no longer useful…

Any human capable of experiencing empathy would have first reacted with disgust and indignation at the unfolding genocide, rather than resorting to scapegoating and divisive rhetoric, but it may also not be organic comments, what do I know…

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

Apologies that this is the first you’re hearing about Israel/Palestine

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Unfortunately it isn’t. When I have some time I call these things out and advocate because I think it’s important that we do not fall into this force feed normalization of cruelty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Then why do you think people should be shocked rather than discussing causes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I find it deeply disturbing that when I opened the comment section of a post discussing 400 (now over 700) dead people, mostly innocent children, men, and women, in less than 48 hours, the first reaction was to blame “Arabs,” “Muslims,” “Tankies,” “Leftists,” and “Pro-Palestinians,” using these minority communities as tokens.

Tankies are not “minority groups”…

This is a glaring display f hypocrisy, these groups are portrayed in a positive light only when it benefits politically, only to be thrown under the bus when they are no longer useful…

There is no hypocrisy. Arabs and Muslims are portrayed in a positive light to counter the American far right’s frothing hatred of them, that was the core reason.

Any human capable of experiencing empathy would have first reacted with disgust and indignation at the unfolding genocide, rather than resorting to scapegoating and divisive rhetoric, but it may also not be organic comments, what do I know…

“divisive rhetoric” you sound like a fucking centrist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
  1. I may have used the wrong word but I think you understood what I meant. It’s not an essay, I was displaying the fact that some minority opinions and certain groups of individuals get targeted because they are easy target that helps sway the blame away.

  2. About your second point, I don’t think it’s correct or else we wouldn’t be reading the gloating in the comments I’m targeting.

  3. I am not and will never be a centrist nor a republican, but I will criticize what I deem injustice, bad policies, weak strategies (like ostracizing more of your voter base to make them numb)… etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

so long as trump, bibi, putin, and their sycophants are in power, pretty much every man woman and child in gaza is living on borrowed time.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

No change since last war criminal in power either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Which one? Literally every American president since the advent of international criminal law counts as a war criminal. I get you mean Biden, but American imperialism is one of the things wrong with the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No disagreement here

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The problem with you yanks is that you’re too far up your own asses. How predictable is it that the whole discussion under this post is about your last election. Nobody cares any more. Your country is lead by a fascist doing fascist things to you and abroad. And all you do is bicker about what happened half a year ago. Your country is wading in the waters of Rubicon, what are you going to do NOW about it?

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Yeah because it’s impossible to talk about two things at the same time.

What good has analyzing our past decisions and their consequences ever been for us? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

what are you going to do NOW about it?

This mess isn’t on some of us. Some of us tried very hard to prevent this outcome and now suddenly we’re expected to clean up other people’s fucking mess.

Nah, fuck that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At what point did German complicity become a crime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Was Einstein complicit when he fled? I intend to try and leave, or take refuge somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You should just ask the AIPAC zionists this question and not us. We take orders from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ask them what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But thank God we stopped Harris right?

Ugh…

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Was Harris against what Israel was doing?

I can’t remember her stance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

No she was not, however there is a difference between someone indifferent to the suffering of others, and someone like Trump who thinks it’s funny

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

however there is a difference

There’s not. Condemnations and calls to peace do nothing when the flow of weapons and financial support is left untouched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It literally is though. Jesus Christ the level of denial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not, though, as Harris wouldn’t have changed much. The US would have supported Israel in this war whoever the president is. You think Israel would have let a Palestinian or an Arabic authority supervise Gaza after they did all the work of destroying it? Harris wouldn’t have put any real pressure on Israel, and based on her campaign it seemed like even the little angry comments every now and then would also disappear.

A country that may have benefited from Harris being president is Lebanon for example, but for Palestine as a whole this was the plan since the beginning.

What you probably meant is this being about the US and it’s unconditional support, not it’s elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just like the swift boats crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments